|
Despite widespread opposition from
Alaskans, Governor Frank Murkowski is once again trying to lift the ban on toxic pollution in Alaska?s salmon and
other fish-bearing streams and spawning areas by
allowing mixing zones. Mixing zones are ?sacrifice zones? where water
and habitat quality fail to meet state water quality standards. In a nutshell they
allow polluting industries, such as mining companies, to
discharge their contaminated wastewater into fish streams by relying on the
long-discounted notion that the solution to pollution is dilution.
The Alaska Department of
Environmental Conservation (ADEC) is currently accepting comments on the
newest proposal to roll back the existing ban on mixing zones, weaken fish
protections, and fail to protect water quality. ADEC says that it is responding
to public comments to a similar proposal put forth in 2004 with a more
protective proposal ? a misleading statement because it simply repackaged last
year?s controversial draft regulations.
What you can do:
Alaskans submitted over 600 comment
letters in 2004 in opposition to ADEC?s previous mixing zone proposal. ADEC
will NOT include comments submitted in 2004 as part of this new proposal so we
once again need a few minutes of your time to tell ADEC that mixing zones would
harm our fish and clean water and are therefore unacceptable. Make your voice
heard!
Comment deadline: 5:00 p.m., December 19, 2005
Send your written comments to:
Nancy Sonafrank, ADEC
610 University Drive
Fairbanks,
AK 99709
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
If you can?t do anything else, sign an on-line petition here. Signing
this petition will add weight to the message that Alaskans don?t want toxic
pollution in their fish streams. What?s wrong with the proposed mixing zone regulations?
The proposed language by ADEC fails to protect fish and human health
because:
- Mixing Zones Hurt Fish
Habitat. Mixing zones in fish-bearing streams are contrary to
the fish protection goals of the Clean Water Act. The Clean Water Act requires
that water quality standards protect fish by maintaining and enhancing existing
water quality. Mixing zones in salmon streams would degrade fish habitat.
- Loophole Sidesteps Fish
Protection. Even though ADEC claims that mixing zone
applications must pass a 19-part test before approval, the state has unlimited
discretion to grant permits to applications that fail the 19-part test if the
applicants submit ?mitigation plans? to ADEC. Allowing corporations or
municipalities to upgrade habitat somewhere else while degrading salmon streams
harms Alaska?s wild salmon and other fish.
- Vague Guidelines Don?t Protect
Fish. The proposal leaves key terms undefined, such as
?economically feasible,? ?overall biological integrity,? and ?objectionable
deposits.? This lack of clarity gives ADEC complete discretion to interpret and
implement the regulations however it wants.
- Lack of Resources for
Enforcement. There are over 15,000 spawning streams in Alaska
that support important commercial, sport, and subsistence fisheries. ADEC lacks
the personnel and resources necessary to assess mixing zone permits, enforce
permit terms, and analyze projects over time. As a result, the agency will be
unable to adequately protect fish and fish habitat.
Why else should we be
concerned? The Alaska seafood industry enjoys a
considerable marketing edge because people value wild Alaska salmon that live
from hatching to harvest in pristine, unpolluted waters. Any perception that the
state is reducing its world-renowned level of salmon protection, or polluting
our waters, could seriously jeopardize the health of our fishing industries.
ADEC says some communities that received permits before the current ban
on mixing zones in fish streams need mixing zones to dispose of their waste.
Instead of dragging the whole state backwards to allow more pollution in our
streams, ADEC could take a step forward and work with those municipalities to
design temporary, site-specific variances that would eventually phase out the
need for mixing zones entirely.
View the proposed ADEC regulations here.
View a list of frequently asked questions and answers about this proposal here.
View additional talking points for writing you action letter here.
|